You would likely discover cavemen claiming why one form of flint is preferable to another for starting a fireplace, if you returned to the Stone-Age. More recently nevertheless, and more on issue, you have to return to the DOS age as well as the 1980s to see OS bigotry. It wasn't common to discover users claim which version of DOS was greatest.
It meets for this discourse though the phrase distro was not bandied about in the eighties. There were not almost as many choices for Disk Operating System as there are for Linux now when it found DOS distros. You can find numerous Linux distributions that are miniature, but from leading supplies, there are over several. Distrowatch.org lists the Top 10 at the same time as most of the remainder.
In the DOS age though you actually just had 3 important supplies to select from:
PCDOS
MSDOS
DRDOS
PC DOS / MS DOS
Up till DOS 6.0, the only important difference between PC DOS and MS DOS other than the title was Fundamental. Early variants of PC DOS had a software called BASICA.COM which will hook to the Fundamental ROM that has been located in early IBM PCs. IBM-clones firms did not contain these ROMs, so Microsoft returned to its origins and produced GW Basic for MSDOS. GW allegedly stood for Gee-Whiz, which looked like an unusual option as opposed to calling it M-S-Fundamental. GW-Basic Qbasic which was an derivative of Fast Fundamental ultimately changed.
PC DOS and MS DOS started off being basically the exact same operating system. Microsoft bought Q-DOS developed PC-DOS and for IBM when the primary PC sent. Included in the offer, Microsoft was allowed the right to send its version of DOS called MSDOS which it accredited to IBM-clone businesses.
IBM and Microsoft revved the variant for DOS generally only when there is an important improvement in hardware.